Alphabet becomes Google’s Holding Company

Alphabet logoGoogle is going thru a branding and rebranding of sorts with the formation of a new holding company called Alphabet. Read all about it at ABC.xyc

Interesting name and logo, right?

We liked the name Alphabet because it means a collection of letters that represent language, one of humanity’s most important innovations, and is the core of how we index with Google search! We also like that it means alpha‑bet (Alpha is investment return above benchmark), which we strive for!

Plain. Red. Simple.

Sergey Brin and Larry Page will head Alphabet and Sundar Pichai will become the CEO of Google. Susan Wojcicki continues as the CEO of YouTube.

 

UPDATE (8-12/2015): BMW owns Alphabet.com.

Is it Time to Give up on Google+ Yet?

Deborah Shapiro ArtistToday I posted something on Google+, sending a compliment to an artist friend of mine about a very cool video she posted.

Later I got a response in my Facebook explaining that she got the message via email but can’t figure out how to find and access the Google+ posting to send a thank you.

I had to agree with her… Google+ is about the hardest social media vehicle I’ve ever tried to use. I also don’t like how it tries to mush everything together in a way that I’m uncomfortable with. They want ONE account for all of my stuff.

For so long, I’ve tried to be separate with the personal and professional things. I mean, the IRS wants things separated so that you don’t use your business tools for personal use.  That becomes harder all the time as business becomes more virtual with phones and the cloud.   Trying to separate business social media from personal social media also helps me to stay focused on my company and client work during “normal working hours.”

But the lines have really blurred lately.

I was hoping that the third time (after Google Buzz and Google Wave) would be the charm.

At this point, I have a lot of social media accounts that I use for business, but I’m about to abandon Google+.

Can anyone convince me that there are good reasons to keep it going?

I’m curious, when is the last time you logged into Google+ or posted something on it? Is there a reason I should continue to try to keep yet another social media site active?

The Danger of Using a Spokesperson in Your Marketing

Don't  worry about your cartoonTestimonials. Spokesperson. Celebrity endorsements.

In many ways these seem like a great idea for promoting your brand. You ride the wave of recognition, likability, and repeatability.

And your brand image edges blur into the reputation of the person who is speaking for and about your brand.

It usually starts out smoothly and everyone is all smiles.

But then something happens.

Sometimes a celebrity’s personal life choices are not what you’d want to have your target market think of when they think of your brand.

Or the spokesperson does something illegal, or is just being investigated for maybe doing something illegal.

Because of the immediacy of social media, it may not even matter if they are guilty or not, the mob mentality has already gotten a hold of the news and “shared it”.

As the owner of the brand, you have some tough choices.  Sometimes the best choice is to “immediately sever all ties.” In other situations, when the behavior is “inconsistent with the company’s image”, announcing that you and the spokesperson have  “mutually decided to suspend the relationship” may the best course of action.

When using a spokesperson or other endorsement where the brands get intertwined, good marketing plans include an exit strategy, just in case things don’t work out.

Brands like Nike, Kellogg, Speedo, Subway, and Jello have all had these types of discussions with athletic celebrities who have done endorsements for their brands.

So while have a “Tony the Tiger”, a “Burger King” or a “Dough Boy” might not be as powerful as a star athlete, or top celebrity or even a real person who has successfully used your brand to lose weight, as the marketing manager on the brand, you don’t have to worry about your cartoon character going “out of character.”

How Many Interviews Does it Take to Make a Decision?

I recently read that Ikea will be doing market research with their customers.

They want to get some ideas for new product development. No big surprise there.

What did surprise me was HOW MANY they were going to do. Not a focus group of 10-12 customers in 3 different cities… or even 2 sets of 10-12 customers in 3 different cities.

Not the 125 or 150 people of one-on-one in person surveys that are sometimes called a mall intercept.

No, they are going to talk with 1,000 of their consumers! In person – at their house – looking at their furniture.

I find that number pretty amazing. I imagine that they will be using customer service staff, R&D staff, marketing staff and more to get all those interviews done in a year. I can just imagine the report! Better not print it out unless you have a few reams of paper!

They’re sure to get lots of ideas, but with a 1,000 interviews, it’s almost like combining qualitative and quantitative market research!

I’m curious… How many in-person interviews have you done with your clients or customers to make a decision? Do you use the results to improve current products, validate new products before launch or brainstorm new ideas? Leave a message in the comments below.

Marketing to People over a Certain Age

Life Expectancy Changes in the US
Click to view the “Next Four Decades” PDF from the Administration on Aging.

The word OLD – ELDERLY has shifted. At first I thought it was because I was (am) getting older. But I found out, it’s not.

We know that by 2030 about 20% of the United States will be in that “Certain Age” category.  And there will be more people in that category than before. (That’s only 15 years away!)

The terms have changed because as a group, in general, we are living longer. So “old” is “older” than it used to be.

Why don’t I use the term elderly, senior or even retired? Because the terms have shifted.  People don’t necessarily retire at 62. And what used to be considered entirely appropriate has changed. The facts have changed!

No wonder no one knows what the term elderly actually means! (does it mean someone more frail, difficulty walking and who needs mid-day naps? Or is elderly actually an age?)

Where you were born as well as how long you have lived (the longer you live, the more your life expectancy increases) both make a big difference in how long you will live.

Silver is used as a code word: “silver sneakers” (although it’s not just for “older” adults. “silver tsumani” refers to the aging workforce where 25% will be over 55 in 5 years. Maybe silver refers to the hair color?

I thought that the word “silver” was used because the silver anniversary is at 50, but that’s actually the Gold anniversary.  (The silver anniversary is 25 years!) Gold and golden are also used as in the “Golden Buckeye” card for those 60 and older in Ohio.  (And 60 is the diamond anniversary!)

You can see why it gets confusing for marketing terms.

The New York Times in 1998 calls it “Junior-Seniors”  “Near elderly” are people ages 40 to 60? (So I guess that makes 60 elderly?)

How do you describe an exercise class for a “certain age” age group.  As marketers, we’re always trying to describe groups of people. Active seniors or active adults. What do you picture? Stereotyping people can be offensive at best, but really bad when you pick an unflattering term.

So we need a way to describe this marketing group that doesn’t offend. Why are people so touchy? In part because the words elderly, old, and senior citizens-  even retired! – were used describe someone of a different age bracket and “life expectancy for Americans jumped from 47 to 71..”

Stereotyping a group of people for marketing is always hard not to offend. Adding a positive adjective can help, but not solve the challenge. Active senior for example. As a marketer, I know what that means, but if I’m thinking of that term as it relates to myself, I think of an active senior as what I was in my last year of college/high school… Maybe mature? Experienced?

Unfortunately, it is possible to age without gaining experience or maturity!

The other important point about aging, the older you are, the more likely you will get older. That is, if life expectancy when you were born was 65 and now you are 65, it hasn’t stayed the same number. In simple terms, half would make it to 65 and the other half wouldn’t. And if the Social Security expectation is another 13 years, that means on average half will make it and half won’t another 13 years, right?

Either way, the older I get, the more surprise I get at the term elderly being used to describe someone I think of as a peer. Active aging, strong seniors, older adults

Your thoughts?